Wild bees of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument

Occurrence
Latest version published by USDA-ARS Pollinating Insect-Biology, Management, Systematics Research on Jun 13, 2023 USDA-ARS Pollinating Insect-Biology, Management, Systematics Research
Publication date:
13 June 2023
License:
CC-BY-NC 4.0

Download the latest version of this resource data as a Darwin Core Archive (DwC-A) or the resource metadata as EML or RTF:

Data as a DwC-A file download 98,720 records in English (5 MB) - Update frequency: irregular
Metadata as an EML file download in English (68 KB)
Metadata as an RTF file download in English (55 KB)

Description

We conducted a large-scale, multi-year inventory of the bee fauna of one such area, Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (GSENM), which is a large area of protected land that, until recently, incorporated nearly 1.9 million acres of the Colorado Plateau in south-central Utah. While the monument is dominated by cold-desert plant communities, plants associated with warmer ecoregions occur at its southern and western extents. The region includes a diverse flora, with many endemic species (Fertig, 2005). Elevations in the monument range from 1,356 to 2,316 m, and encompass stands of aspen (Populus tremuloides), ponderosa (Pinus ponderosa), pinyon (Pinus spp.), juniper (Juniperus spp.), blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosissima), sagebrush (Artemisia spp.), grasslands, mixed desert scrub, meadows, and riparian zones. Temperatures range annually from −11 °C to 38 °C. Most precipitation occurs in the form of summer rainfall (average: 13.5 cm across the four years of our study, 2000–2003) with monsoonal weather events, but snow is also common throughout the monument from November through March (average across the years of the study: 11.7 cm) (Utah Climate Center, 2001–2005: https://climate.usu.edu/). Our study of GSENM used standardized bi-monthly sampling in one-hectare plots, supplemented by opportunistic collections, in order to determine the richness and diversity of bees in this protected area, assess short and long-term population fluctuations in bee species, as well as associate bees with habitat types. Prior to our study, knowledge of the fauna was limited to only 20 collector-days of sampling for the monument, and all were along major roads (Griswold, Parker & Tepedino, 1998). Our study provides an example of the usefulness of national monuments and parks for scientific studies of insects whose populations are difficult to quantify. Eventually, our research will result in additional publications on the spatial and temporal drivers of bee diversity on this landscape. For this particular paper, our focus is on documenting, summarizing, and broadly characterizing the diverse and unique bee fauna protected by GSENM. Specifically, we describe (1) the bee diversity, including new range boundaries and a summary of known life history traits, (2) spatial patterns, (3) seasonal patterns, and (4) floral relationships of the bee assemblage. Finally, we compare the diversity and composition of GSENM’s fauna with other known bee assemblages, and consider this community in the context of western bee distributions.

Data Records

The data in this occurrence resource has been published as a Darwin Core Archive (DwC-A), which is a standardized format for sharing biodiversity data as a set of one or more data tables. The core data table contains 98,720 records.

This IPT archives the data and thus serves as the data repository. The data and resource metadata are available for download in the downloads section. The versions table lists other versions of the resource that have been made publicly available and allows tracking changes made to the resource over time.

Versions

The table below shows only published versions of the resource that are publicly accessible.

How to cite

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Carril OM, Griswold T, Haefner J, Wilson JS. 2018. Wild bees of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument: richness, abundance, and spatio-temporal beta-diversity. PeerJ 6:e5867 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5867

Rights

Researchers should respect the following rights statement:

The publisher and rights holder of this work is USDA-ARS Pollinating Insect-Biology, Management, Systematics Research. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License.

GBIF Registration

This resource has been registered with GBIF, and assigned the following GBIF UUID: 491177c8-d074-46c0-9da3-0e9d1794936f.  USDA-ARS Pollinating Insect-Biology, Management, Systematics Research publishes this resource, and is itself registered in GBIF as a data publisher endorsed by U.S. Geological Survey.

Keywords

Occurrence; Bee declines; Pollinators; Conservation; National monuments; Native bees; Pollination ecology; Bee declines; Pollinators; Conservation; National monuments; Native bees; Pollination ecology

External data

The resource data is also available in other formats

Figure 1 https://dfzljdn9uc3pi.cloudfront.net/2018/5867/1/fig-1-full.png ISO 8859-1 (Latin-1) png
Figure 2 https://dfzljdn9uc3pi.cloudfront.net/2018/5867/1/fig-2-full.png ISO 8859-1 (Latin-1) png

Contacts

Olivia Carril
  • Author ●
  • Originator ●
  • Point Of Contact
Joseph Wilson
  • Author ●
  • Originator
Utah State University
1021 West Vine Street
84074 Tooele
Utah
US
435 797 9953
http://www.insectevolutionlab.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9124-4048
Terry Griswold
  • Author ●
  • Originator
USDA-ARS
5310 Old Main Hill
84322 Logan
Utah
US
Harold Ikerd Ikerd
  • Metadata Provider
USDA-ARS
5310 Old Main Hill
84322 Logan
Utah
US
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5043-6484
Harold Ikerd
  • Curator
USDA-ARS-PIRU
5310 Old Main Hill
84322 Logan
Utah
US
435-797-2526
https://www.ars.usda.gov/people-locations/person/?person-id=39335
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5043-6484
James Haefner
  • Author
Utah State University
5310 Old Main Hill
84074 Logan
Utah
US

Geographic Coverage

Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (GSENM), which is a large area of protected land that, until recently, incorporated nearly 1.9 million acres of the Colorado Plateau in south-central Utah.

Bounding Coordinates South West [37.035, -112.836], North East [38.597, -110.452]

Taxonomic Coverage

Here we serve data on a 4-year study of bees in Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (GSENM), found in southern Utah, USA as used in the paper "Wild bees of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument: richness, abundance, and spatio-temporal beta-diversity" doi: 10.7717/peerj.5867

Superfamily Apoidea; Latreille, 1802 (bees)

Temporal Coverage

Start Date / End Date 2000-01-01 / 2003-09-30

Project Data

The focus is on documenting, summarizing, and broadly characterizing the diverse and unique bee fauna protected by GSENM. The data present here was use to describe (1) the bee diversity, including new range boundaries, (2) spatial patterns, (3) seasonal patterns, and (4) floral relationships of the bee assemblage.

Title Wild bees of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument
Funding Funding was provided from the Bureau of Land Management. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Study Area Description Protected lands, such as monuments and parks, provide an exceptional opportunity for monitoring bee populations and thoroughly documenting the presence and abundance of a bee fauna for a large area. As there is no mandate for multiple use, national monuments and national parks seldom experience large-scale, unnatural changes across a landscape (Acrygg et al., 2013; Stein, Scott & Benton, 2008), and are less affected by some of the potential threats to native bees, including pesticides and fertilizers (Roulston & Goodell, 2011; Woodcock et al., 2017), conversion to agricultural or otherwise developed lands (Forrest et al., 2015; Palma, 2015), competition with honey bee hives (Cane & Tepedino, 2017), and habitat fragmentation (Howell, Alarcon & Minckley, 2017; Steffan-Dewenter, 2003). They provide a valuable natural laboratory in which to conduct standardized collections, that allows for the resampling of an area over long periods to observe trends in bee populations. Finally, they provide a spotlight for the organisms within. Through outreach and education, monuments and parks enlighten millions of visitors each year about the creatures they protect, and the value of those creatures for ecosystem function (Fancy, Gross & Carter, 2009). We conducted a large-scale, multi-year inventory of the bee fauna of one such area, Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (GSENM), which is a large area of protected land that, until recently, incorporated nearly 1.9 million acres of the Colorado Plateau in south-central Utah. While the monument is dominated by cold-desert plant communities, plants associated with warmer ecoregions occur at its southern and western extents. The region includes a diverse flora, with many endemic species (Fertig, 2005). Elevations in the monument range from 1,356 to 2,316 m, and encompass stands of aspen (Populus tremuloides), ponderosa (Pinus ponderosa), pinyon (Pinus spp.), juniper (Juniperus spp.), blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosissima), sagebrush (Artemisia spp.), grasslands, mixed desert scrub, meadows, and riparian zones. Temperatures range annually from −11 °C to 38 °C. Most precipitation occurs in the form of summer rainfall (average: 13.5 cm across the four years of our study, 2000–2003) with monsoonal weather events, but snow is also common throughout the monument from November through March (average across the years of the study: 11.7 cm) (Utah Climate Center, 2001–2005: https://climate.usu.edu/).
Design Description Our study of GSENM used standardized bi-monthly sampling in one-hectare plots, supplemented by opportunistic collections, in order to determine the richness and diversity of bees in this protected area, assess short and long-term population fluctuations in bee species, as well as associate bees with habitat types.

The personnel involved in the project:

Olivia Carril
  • Author
Joseph Wilson
  • Author
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9124-4048

Sampling Methods

Across GSENM, and across the four years of the study, a total of 66 plots, each 50 m × 200 m were established; 11 plots were sampled all four years, 12 plots were sampled for three years, 12 were sampled two years, and 31 plots were sampled for just one year. Plot locations were stratified by habitat and represent a subset of plots documented by vegetation-mapping specialists working simultaneously in the monument (Stohlgren et al., 1998). Each plot was visited at approximately two-week intervals. On a given sampling day, pairs of collectors sampled each plot using aerial nets for two 45-minute periods—between 0900 and 1530, once before noon and once after. A plot visit, therefore, represents a total of 360 min (3 h) of collecting. An effort was made to collect the entire area of the plot evenly during a sampling period, and to collect from all bee-visited flowering plants in the plot. Collections were biased against honey bees—given a choice between collecting a feral honey bee, Apis mellifera Linnaeus and another bee, the other bee was collected. Attempts were made to collect every native bee encountered. Most plants on which bees were collected were identified to species using regional keys (Welsh et al., 1993). The remaining plants were identified to genus. The number of plots established for regular visitation was balanced against coverage across the monument. Those plots that were sampled for multiple years were chosen because of their accessibility and because they were representative of the majority of the monument’s habitats.

Study Extent We collected bees in GSENM over a period of four years (2000–2003) using both opportunistic collections and standardized bi-monthly sampling in one-hectare plots. This follows a protocol commonly used for bee studies, providing the opportunity for comparisons with other areas, past and future (LeBuhn, 2003)

Method step description:

  1. Withheld Information. Some data has been withheld do to plant associations or sensitive locations. Fields associated with date, verbatim data, associated taxa, elevation and location may be withheld or fuzzed. Refer to the Darwin Core Fields "informationWithheld" and "DataGeneralizations" for specific information.

Collection Data

Collection Name USDA-ARS Pollinating Insect-Biology, Management, Systematics Research
Parent Collection Identifier Not Applicable
Specimen preservation methods Pinned

Bibliographic Citations

  1. Acrygg et al. (2013) Acrygg JL, Davidson A, Syancara LK, Gergely KJ, McKerrow A, Scott JM. Representation of ecological systems within the protected areas network of the continental United States. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e54689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054689. 10.1371/journal.pone.0054689
  2. Adlakha RL. 1969. A systematic revision of the bee genus Diadasia Patton in America north of Mexico (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae) Thesis, University of California, Davis, CA
  3. Alexander BA. 1994. Species-groups and cladistic analysis of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Nomada (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) University of Kansas Science Bulletin 55:175-238
  4. Ascher J, Pickering J. 2018. Discover Life bee species guide and world checklist (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) (accessed July 2018)
  5. Baker JR. 1975. Taxonomy of five Nearctic subgenera of Coelioxys (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) The University of Kansas Science Bulletin 50:649-730
  6. Bartomeus I, Ascher JS, Gibbs J, Danforth BN, Wagner DL, Hedtke SM, Winfree R. 2013. Historical changes in northeastern U.S. bee populations related to shared ecological traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 10:4656-4660
  7. Biesmeijer JC, Robers SPM, Remmer M, Ohlemuller R, Edwards M, Peeters T, Schaffers AP, Potts SG, Kleukers CD, Settele J+1 more. 2006. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313:351-354
  8. Blair BH, Cockerell TDA. 1935. The bees of the group Dieunomia. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 43:201-214
  9. Bohart GE. 1947. New North American bees of the genus Dufourea (Apoidea—Halictidae) Part I. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 40:692-704
  10. Bohart GE. 1948. New North American bees of the genus Dufourea (Apoidea—Halictidae) Part II. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 41:119-136
  11. Bohart GE. 1949. New North American bees of the genus Dufourea (Apoidea—Halictidae) Part III. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 42:55-62
  12. Bohart GE, Knowlton GF. 1973. The bees of Curlew Valley (Utah and Idaho) Proceedings of the Utah Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters 50:1-9
  13. Bouseman JK, LaBerge WE. 1978. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere. Part IX. Subgenus Melandrena. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 104:275-389
  14. Broemeling DK. 1988. A revision of the Nomada subgenus Pachynomada (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae) Pan-Pacific Entomologist 64:201-227
  15. Brooks RW. 1983. Systematics and bionomics of Anthophora: the bomboides group and species groups of the New World. University of California Publications in Entomology 53:436-575
  16. Brooks RW, Griswold TL. 1988. A key to the species of Trachusa subgenus Heteranthidium with descriptions of new species from Mexico (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae: Anthidiini) Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 61:332-346
  17. Brumley RL. 1965. A revision of the bee genus Epeolus Latreille of western North America north of Mexico. Thesis, Utah State University, Logan, UT thesis
  18. Cane JH, Minckley RL, Kervin L, Roulston TH, Williams NM. 2006. Complex responses within a desert bee guild (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) to urban habitat fragmentation. Ecological Applications 16:632-644
  19. Cane JH, Sipes S. 2006. Characterizing floral specialization by bees: analytical methods and a revised lexicon for oligolecty. In: Waser NM, Ollerton J, eds. Plant–pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 99-122
  20. Cane JH, Tepedino VJ. 2001. Causes and extent of declines among native North American invertebrate pollinators: detection, evidence, and consequences. Ecology and Society 5(1):1
  21. Cane JH, Tepedino VJ. 2017. Gauging the effect of honey bee pollen collection on native bee communities. Conservation Letters 10:205-210
  22. Charlebois JA, Sargent RD. 2017. No consistent pollinator-mediated impacts of alien plants on natives. Ecology Letters 20:1479-1490
  23. Colla SR, Ascher JS, Arduser M, Cane JH, Deyrup M, Droege S, Gibbs J, Griswold TL, Hall HG, Henne C+6 more. 2012. Documenting persistence of most eastern North American bee species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) to 1990–2009. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 85:14-22
  24. Comstock JP, Ehleringer JR. 1992. Plant adaptations in the Great Basin and the Colorado Plateau. Great Basin Naturalist 52:195-215
  25. Crone EE. 2013. Responses of social and solitary bees to pulsed floral resources. The American Naturalist 182:465-473
  26. Cronquist AA, Holmgren AH, Holmgren NH, Reveal JL. 1972. Intermountain Flora. New York: Haefner Publishers.
  27. Daly HV. 1973. Bees of the genus Ceratina in America north of Mexico (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) University of California Publications in Entomology 74:1-114
  28. Danforth BN. 1994. Taxonomic review of Calliopsis subgenus Hypomacotera (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae), with special emphasis on the distributions and host plant associations. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 70:283-300
  29. Danforth BN. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision of the Perdita subgenus Macrotera, Macroteropsis, Macroterella, and Cockerellula (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) University of Kansas Science Bulletin 55:635-692
  30. Denning KR, Foster BL. 2017. Flower visitor communities are similar on remnant and reconstructed tall grass prairies despite forb community differences. Restoration Ecology 26:751-759
  31. Donovan BJ. 1977. A revision of North American bees of the subgenus Cnemidandrena (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) University of California Publications in Entomology 81:1-107
  32. Dorchin A, Dafni A, Izhaki I, Sapir Y, Vereecken NJ. 2017. Patterns and drivers of wild bee community assembly in a Mediterranean IUCN important plant area. Biodiversity and Conservation 27:695-717
  33. Evans DL. 1972. A revision of the subgenus Holonomada of the genus Nomada (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae) Wasmann Journal of Biology 30:1-34
  34. Fancy SG, Gross JE, Carter SL. 2009. Monitoring the condition of natural resources in U.S. national parks. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 151:161-174
  35. Fertig W. 2005. Overview of the vegetation of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. Kanab: Moenave Botanical Consulting. 31
  36. Forrest JRK, Thorp RW, Kremen C, Williams NM. 2015. Contrasting patterns in species and functional-trait diversity of bees in an agricultural landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology 52:706-715
  37. Franzen M, Nilsson SG. 2013. High population variability and source–sink dynamics in a solitary bee species. Ecology 94:1400-1408
  38. Ghazoul J. 2015. Qualifying pollinator decline evidence. Science 348:981-982
  39. Gibbs J. 2010. Revision of the metallic species of Lasioglossum (Dialictus) in Canada (Hymenoptera, Halictidae, Halictini) Zootaxa 2591:1-382
  40. Gibbs J, Ascher JS, Rightmeyer MG, Isaacs R. 2017. The bees of Michigan (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila), with notes on distribution, taxonomy, pollination, and natural history. Zootaxa 4352:1-60
  41. Gonzalez VH, Griswold TL. 2007. A review of the North and Central American Megachile subgenus Argyropile Mitchell (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) Zootaxa 1461:1-14
  42. Gonzalez VH, Griswold TL. 2013. Wool carder bees of the genus Anthidium in the Western Hemisphere (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae): diversity, host-plant associations, phylogeny, and biogeography. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 168:221-425
  43. Goulson D, Nicholls E, Botías C, Rotheray EL. 2015. Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science 347:1255957
  44. Grigarick AA, Stange LA. 1968. The pollen-collecting bees of the Anthidiini of California (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) Bulletin of the California Insect Survey 9:1-122
  45. Griswold TL, Andres M, Andrus R, Garvin G, Keen K, Kervin L, Messinger OJ, Messinger SM, Miller W, Receveur K+2 more. 1999. Final report for a survey of the rare bees of Clark County, Nevada. Logan: USDA ARS Bee Biology and Systematics Laboratory. 152
  46. Griswold TL, Parker FD. 1988. New Perdita (Perdita) oligoleges on Mentzelia, with notes on related species of the ventralis group (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) Pan-Pacific Entomologist 64:43-52
  47. Griswold TL, Parker FD, Tepedino VJ. 1998. The bees of the San Rafael Desert: implications for the bee fauna of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. In: Hill LM, ed. Learning from the land: Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Science Symposium Proceedings. Salt Lake City: Paragon Press. 175-186
  48. Harper KT, Freeman D, Ostler WK, Klikoff LG. 1978. The flora of the Great Basin mountain ranges: diversity, sources, and dispersal ecology. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs 2:81-102
  49. Harrison T, Gibbs J, Winfree R. 2017. Anthropogenic landscapes support fewer rare bee species. Landscape Ecology Epub ahead of print Dec 01 2017
  50. Heard MS, Carvell C, Carreck NL, Rothery P, Osborne JL, Bourke AFG. 2007. Landscape context not patch size determines bumble-bee density on flower mixtures sown for agri-environment schemes. Biological Letters 3:638-641
  51. Howell AD, Alarcon R, Minckley RL. 2017. Effects of habitat fragmentation on the nesting dynamics of desert bees. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 110:233-243
  52. Hurd Jr PD. 1955. The carpenter bees of California. Bulletin of the California Insect Survey 4:35-72
  53. Hurd Jr PD. 1958. American bees of the genus Dioxys Lepeletier and Serville (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) University of California Publications in Entomology 14:275-302
  54. Hurd Jr PD. 1979. Superfamily Apoidea. In: Krombein KV, Hurd P, Smith DR, Burks B, eds. Catalog of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. 106
  55. Hurd Jr PD, Linsley EG. 1951. The melectine bees of California (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae) Bulletin of the California Insect Survey 1:119-140
  56. Hurd Jr PD, Linsley EG. 1967. Squash and gourd bees, genera Peponapis Robertson and Xenoglossa Smith, inhabiting America north of Mexico (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Hilgardia 35:384-472
  57. Hurd Jr PD, Linsley EG. 1972. Parasitic bees of the genus Holcopasites Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 114:1-41
  58. Hurd Jr PD, Michener CD. 1955. The megachiline bees of California (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) Bulletin of the California Insect Survey 3:1-248
  59. Inari N, Hiura T, Toda MJ, Kudo G. 2012. Pollination linkage between canopy flowering, bumble bee abundance and seed production of understory plants in a cool temperate forest. Journal of Ecology 100:1534-1543
  60. Kimoto C, DeBano SJ, Thorp RW, Taylor RV, Schmalz H, DelCurto T, Johnson T, Kennedy PL, Rao S. 2012. Short-term responses of native bees to livestock and implications for managing ecosystem services in grasslands. Ecosphere 3:1-19
  61. LaBerge WE. 1956a. A revision of the bees of the genus Melissodes in North and Central America. Part I (Hymenoptera, Apidae) University of Kansas Science Bulletin 37:911-1194
  62. LaBerge WE. 1956b. A revision of the bees of the genus Melissodes in North and Central America. Part II (Hymenoptera, Apidae) University of Kansas Science Bulletin 38:533-578
  63. LaBerge WE. 1957. The genera of the bees of the tribe Eucerini in North and Central America (Hymenoptera: Apidae) American Museum Novitates 1837:1-44
  64. LaBerge WE. 1958. Notes on the North and Central American bees of the genus Svastra Holmberg (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 31:266-273
  65. LaBerge WE. 1961. A revision of the bees of the genus Melissodes in North and Central America. Part III (Hymenoptera, Apidae) University of Kansas Science Bulletin 42:283-663
  66. LaBerge WE. 1967. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere Part I. Callandrena (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) Bulletin of the University of Nebraska State Museum 7:1-318
  67. LaBerge WE. 1969. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere. Part II. Plastandrena, Aporandrena, Charitandrena. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 95:1-47
  68. LaBerge WE. 1971. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere, Part IV: Scrapteropsis, Xiphandrena, and Rhaphandrena. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 97:441-520
  69. LaBerge WE. 1973. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere. Part VI. Subgenus Trachandrena. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 99:235-371
  70. LaBerge WE. 1977. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere. Part VIII. Subgenera Thysandrena, Dasyandrena, Psammandrena, Rhacandrena, Euandrena, Oxyandrena. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 103:1-143
  71. LaBerge WE. 1980. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere. Part X. Subgenus Andrena. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 106:395-525
  72. LaBerge WE. 1985. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere. Part XI. Minor subgenera and subgeneric key. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 111:441-567
  73. LaBerge WE. 1987. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere. Part XII. Subgenera Leucandrena, Ptilandrena, Scoliandrena, and Melandrena. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 112:191-248
  74. LaBerge WE. 1989. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere. Part XIII. Subgenera Simandrena and Taeniandrena. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 115:1-56
  75. LaBerge WE, Bouseman JK. 1970. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemistphere. Part III. Tylandrena. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 96:543-605
  76. LaBerge WE, Ribble DW. 1972. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere. Part V. Gonandrena, Geissandrena, Parandrena, Pelicandrena. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 89:271-358
  77. LaBerge WE, Ribble DW. 1975. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere. Part VII. Subgenus Euandrena. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 101:371-446
  78. LaBerge WE, Thorp RW. 2005. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere. Part VII. Subgenus Onagandrena. Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 37:1-63
  79. Lebuhn G, Droege S, Connor EF, Gemmill-Herren B, Potts SG, Minckley RL, Griswold T, Jean R, Kula E, Roubik DW+4 more. 2013. Detecting insect pollinator declines on regional and global scales. Conservation Biology 27:13-120
  80. Linsley EG. 1939. A revision of the Nearctic Melectinae (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae) Annals of the Entomological Society of America 32:429-468
  81. McGinley RJ. 1986. Studies of Halictinae (Apoidea: Halictidae), I: revision of New World Lasioglossum Curtis. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 429:1-304
  82. McGinley RJ. 2003. Studies of Halictinae (Apoidea: Halictidae), II: revision of Sphecodogastra Ashmead, Floral specialists on Onagracea. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 610:1-55
  83. McKinney AM, Goodell K. 2010. Shading by invasive shrub reduces seed production and pollinator services in a native herb. Biological Invasions 12:2751-2763
  84. McKinney AM, Goodell K. 2011. Plant–pollinator interactions between an invasive and native plant vary between sites with different flowering phenology. Plant Ecology 212:1025-1035
  85. Messinger OJ, Griswold T. 2002. A Pinnacles of bees. Fremontia 30:32-40
  86. Michener CD. 1938. American bees of the genus Heriades. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 31:514-531
  87. Michener CD. 1939. A revision of the genus Ashmeadiella (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) The American Midland Naturalist 22:1-84
  88. Michener CD. 1947. A revision of the American Species of Hoplitis (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 89:257-318
  89. Michener CD. 1949. A revision of the American species of Diceratosmia (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) Annals of the Entomological Society of America 42:258-264
  90. Michener CD. 1968. Some pacific coast Panurginus (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) The Canadian Entomologis 67:275-278
  91. Michener CD. 1979. Biogeography of the bees. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 66:277-342
  92. Michener CD, McGinley RJ, Danforth BN. 1994. The Bee genera of North and Central America. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. 209
  93. Mitchell TB. 1934. A revision of the genus Megachile in the Nearctic region Part I. Classification and description of new species (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) Transactions of the American Entomological Society 59:295-361
  94. Mitchell TB. 1935. A revision of the genus Megachile in the Nearctic region Part III. Taxonomy of the subgenera Anthemois and Delomegachile (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) Transactions of the American Entomological Society 61:1-44
  95. Mitchell TB. 1936. A revision of the genus Megachile in the Nearctic region Part IV. Taxonomy of subgenera Xanthosarus, Phaenosarus, Megachiloides, and Derotropis (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) Transactions of the American Entomological Society 62:117-166
  96. Mitchell TB. 1937a. A revision of the genus Megachile in the Nearctic region Part V. Taxonomy of the subgenus Xeromegachile (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) Transactions of the American Entomological Society 62:323-382
  97. Mitchell TB. 1937b. A revision of the genus Megachile in the Nearctic region Part VI. Taxonomy of the subgenus Argyropile, Leptorachis, Pseundcentron, Acentron, and Melanosarus (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) Transactions of the American Entomological Society 63:45-83
  98. Mitchell TB. 1937c. A revision of the genus Megachile in the Nearctic region Part VII. Taxonomy of the subgenus Sayapis (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) Transactions of the American Entomological Society 63:175-206
  99. Mitchell TB. 1937d. A revision of the genus Megachile in the Nearctic region Part VIII. Taxonomy of the subgenus Chelostomoides, addenda and index (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) Transactions of the American Entomological Society 63:381-426
  100. Moldenke AR. 1976. Evolutionary history and diversity of the bee faunas of Chile and Pacific North America. Wasmann Journal of Biology 34:147-178
  101. Nicholson CC, Koh I, Richardson LL, Beauchemin A, Ricketts TH. 2017. Farm and landscape factors interact to affect the supply of pollination services. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 250:113-122
  102. Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S. 2011. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120:321-326
  103. Orr MC, Griswold T, Pitts JP, Parker FD. 2016. A new bee species that excavates sandstone nests. Current Biology 26:R779-R793
  104. Palma D. 2015. Ecological traits affect the sensitivity of bees to land-use pressures in European agricultural landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology 52:1567-1577
  105. Parker FD, Griswold TL. 2013. New species of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Stelis (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae, Anthidiini) from the Nearctic Region. Zootaxa 3646:529-544
  106. Pascarella JB, Waddington KD, Neal PR. 1999. The bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) of Everglades National Park, Florida and adjacent areas: distribution, phenology, and biogeography. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 72:32-45
  107. Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE. 2010. Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts, drivers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25:345-353
  108. Potts SG, Vulliamy GB, Dafni A, Ne’eman G, Willmer P. 2003. Linking bees and flowers: how do floral communities structure pollinator communities? Ecology 84:2628-2642
  109. Ribble DW. 1968a. Revisions of two subgenera of Andrena: Micrandrena Ashmead and Derandrena, new subgenus (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Bulletin of the University of Nebraska State Museum 8:237-394
  110. Ribble DW. 1968b. A new subgenus, Belandrena, of the genus Andrena (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 41:220-236
  111. Ribble DW. 1974. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere, subgenus Scaphandrena. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 100:101-189
  112. Rightmyer MG. 2008. A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Triepeolus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Part I. Zootaxa 1710:1-170
  113. Rightmyer MG, Griswold T, Arduser MS. 2010. A review of the non-metallic Osmia (Melanosmia) found in North America, with additional notes on Palearctic Melanosmia (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) ZooKeys 60:37-77
  114. Roberts RB. 1973. Revision of the bee genus Agapostemon (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) University of Kansas Science Bulletin 49:437-590
  115. Rodrigues ASL, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI, Boitani L, Brooks TM, Cowling RM, Fishpool LDC, Da Fonseca GAB, Gaston KJ, Hoffmann M+11 more. 2004. Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428:640-643
  116. Roulston T, Goodell K. 2011. The role of resources and risks in regulations wild bee populations. Annual Review of Entomology 56:293-312
  117. Rozen Jr JG. 1958. Monographic study of the genus Nomadopsis Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) University of California Publications in Entomology 15:1-202
  118. Russo L, Park M, Gibbs J, Danforth B. 2015. The challenge of accurately documenting bee species richness in agroecosystems: bee diversity in eastern apple orchards. Ecology and Evolution 5:3531-3540
  119. Russo L, Stehuower R, Heberling JM, Shea K. 2011. The composite insect trap: an innovative combination trap for biologically diverse sampling. PLOS ONE 6(6):e2107
  120. Rust RW. 1974. The Systematics and Biology of the Genus Osmia, Subgenera Osmia, Chalcosmia, and Cephalosmia (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) The Wasmann Journal of Biology 32:1-93
  121. Rust RW, Bohart GE. 1986. New species of Osmia (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) from the southwestern United States. Entomological News 97:14-155
  122. Sandhouse GA. 1939. The North American bees of the genus Osmia (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Washington 1:1-167
  123. Scheper J, Bommarco R, Holzschuh A, Potts SG, Riedinger V, Roberts SPM, Rundlof M, Smith HG, Steffan-Dewenter I, Wickens JB+3 more. 2015. Local and landscape-level floral resources explain effects of wildflower strips on wild bees across four European countries. Journal of Applied Ecology 52:1165-1175
  124. Snelling RR. 1966a. Studies on North American bees of the genus Hylaeus. 1. Distribution of the western species of the subgenus Prosopis with descriptions of new forms (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) Los Angeles County Museum Contributions in Science 98:1-18
  125. Snelling RR. 1966b. Studies in North American bees of the genus Hylaeus 2. Description of a new subgenus and species (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 79:139-144
  126. Snelling RR. 1966c. Studies in North American bees of the genus Hylaeus 3. The Nearctic subgenera (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 65:164-175
  127. Snelling RR. 1966d. The taxonomy and nomenclature of some North American bees of the genus Centris with descriptions of new species (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae) Los Angeles County Museum Contributions in Science 112:1-33
  128. Snelling RR. 1967. Description of a new Subgenus of Osmia, (Hymenoptera Megachilidae) Subgenus Mystacosmia New Subgenus. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 66:103-10
  129. Snelling RR. 1968. Studies of North American bees of the genus Hylaeus 4. The subgenera Cephalylaeus, Metziella, and Hylaeana (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) Los Angeles County Museum Contributions in Science 144:1-6
  130. Snelling RR. 1970. Studies of North American bees of the genus Hylaeus. 5. The subgenera Hylaeus, s. str. and Paraprosopis (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) Los Angeles County Museum Contributions in Science 180:1-60
  131. Snelling RR. 1983. The North American species of the bee genus Lithurge (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) Los Angeles County Museum Contributions in Science 343:1-11
  132. Snelling RR. 1990. A review of the native North American bees of the genus Chalicodoma (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Contributions in Science 421:1-39
  133. Stage GI. 1966. Biology and systematics of the American species of the genus Hesperapis Cockerell. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley thesis
  134. Steffan-Dewenter I. 2003. Importance of habitat area and landscape context for species richness of bees and wasps in fragmented orchard meadows. Conservation Biology 17:1036-1044
  135. Stein BA, Scott C, Benton N. 2008. Federal lands and endangered species: the role of military and other federal lands in sustaining biodiversity. BioScience 58:339-347
  136. Stephen WP. 1954. A revision of the bee genus Colletes in America North of Mexico (Hymenoptera, Colletidae) The University of Kansas Science Bulletin 36:149-527
  137. Stephen WP. 1957. Bumblebees of western America, Technical Bulletin. Corvallis: Oregon State College, Agricultural Experiment Station. 40:163
  138. Stohlgren TJ, Belknap J, Chong GW, Reich R. 1998. A plan to assess native and exotic plant diversity and cryptobiotic crusts in the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. In: Hill LM, ed. Learning from the land: Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Science symposium proceedings. Salt Lake City: Paragon Press. 269-276
  139. Tepedino VJ, Bradley BA, Griswold TL. 2008. Might flowers of invasive plants increase native bee carrying capacity? Intimations from Capital Reef National Park, Utah. Natural Areas Journal 28:44-50
  140. Tepedino VJ, Stanton NL. 1981. Diversity and competition in bee-plant communities on short-grass prairies. Oikos 36:35-44
  141. Thorp RW. 1969. Systematics and ecology of bees of the subgenus Diandrena (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) University of California Publications in Entomology 52:1-146
  142. Thorp RW, LaBerge WE. 2005. A revision of the bees of the genus Andrena of the western hemisphere. Part XV. Subgenus Hesperandrena. Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 37:64-93
  143. Timberlake PH. 1954. A revisional study of the bees of the genus Perdita F. Smith, with special reference to the fauna of the Pacific coast (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) Part I. University of California Publications in Entomology 9:345-432
  144. Timberlake PH. 1956. A revisional study of the bees of the genus Perdita F. Smith, with special reference to the fauna of the Pacific coast (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) Part II. University of California Publications in Entomology 9:247-349
  145. Timberlake PH. 1958. A revisional study of the bees of the genus Perdita F. Smith, with special reference to the fauna of the Pacific coast (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) Part III. University of California Publications in Entomology 14:303-410
  146. Timberlake PH. 1960. A revisional study of the bees of the genus Perdita F. Smith, with special reference to the fauna of the Pacific coast (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) Part IV. University of California Publications in Entomology 17:1-156
  147. Timberlake PH. 1962. A revisional study of the bees of the genus Perdita F. Smith, with special reference to the fauna of the Pacific coast (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) Part V. University of California Publications in Entomology 28:1-124
  148. Timberlake PH. 1964. A revisional study of the bees of the genus Perdita F. Smith, with special reference to the fauna of the Pacific coast (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) Part VI. University of California Publications in Entomology 28:125-388
  149. Timberlake PH. 1968. A revisional study of the bees of the genus Perdita F. Smith, with special reference to the fauna of the Pacific coast (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) Part VII. University of California Publications in Entomology 49:1-196
  150. Timberlake PH. 1969. A contribution to the systematics of North American species of Synhalonia (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) University of California Publications in Entomology 57:1-76
  151. Timberlake PH. 1971. Supplementary studies on the systematics of the genus Perdita (Hymenoptera, Andrenidae) University of California Publications in Entomology 66:1-63
  152. Timberlake PH. 1973. Revision of the genus Pseudopanurgus of North America (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) University of California Publications in Entomology 72:1-58
  153. Timberlake PH. 1975. The North American species of Heterosarus Robertson (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) University of California Publications in Entomology 77:1-56
  154. Timberlake PH. 1976. Revision of the North American bees of the genus Protandrena Cockerell (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Transactions of the American Entomological Society 102:133-227
  155. Timberlake PH. 1980. Review of North American Exomalopsis (Hymenoptera, Anthophoridae) University of California Publications in Entomology 86:1-158
  156. Toler T. 2001. Diversity, distribution, and abundance of flower-visiting Apoidea (Hymenoptera) on sand dunes of the west desert of Utah. Thesis, Utah State University, Logan thesis
  157. Utah Climate Center. 2001–2005. Utah State University. http://climate.usurf.usu.edu (Accessed)
  158. Vanbergen AJ, Espíndola A, Aizen MA. 2018. Risks to pollinators and pollination from invasive alien species. Nature Ecology & Evolution 2:16-25
  159. Venturini EM, Drummond FA, Hoshide AK, Dibble AC, Stack LB. 2017. Pollination reservoirs for wild bee habitat enhancement in cropping systems: a review. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 4:101-142
  160. Warzecha D, Diekotter T, Wolters V, Jauker F. 2017. Attractiveness of wildflower mixtures for wild bees and hoverflies depends on some key plant species. Insect Conservation and Diversity 11:32-41
  161. Welsh SL, Atwood ND. 2002. Flora of the bureau of land management Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument and Kane County, Utah. Provo: Brigham Young University. 166
  162. Welsh SL, Atwood ND, Goodrich S, Higgins LC. 1993. A Utah Flora. Provo: Brigham Young University.
  163. White JR. 1952. A revision of the genus Osmia, subgenus Acanthosmioides (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) University of Kansas Science Bulletin 35:219-307
  164. Williams PH, Cameraon SA, Hines HM, Cederberg B, Rasmont P. 2008. A simplified subgeneric classification of the bumblebees (genus Bombus) Apidologie 39:46-74
  165. Williams NM, Minckley RL, Silveira FA. 2001. Variation in native bee faunas and its implications for detecting community changes. Conservation Ecology 5:7
  166. Wilson JS, Messinger OJ, Griswold T. 2009. Variation between bee communities on a sand dune complex in the Great Basin Desert, North America: Implications for sand dune conservation. Journal of Arid Environments 73:666-671
  167. Wilson JS, Pitts JP. 2012. Identifying Pleistocene refugia in North American cold deserts using phylogeographic analyses and ecological niche modeling. Diversity and Distributions 18:1139-1152
  168. Wilson JS, Wilson LE, Loftis LD, Griswold T. 2010. The montane bee fauna of north central Washington, USA. Western North American Naturalist 70:198-207
  169. Winfree R, Fox JW, Williams NM, Reilly JR, Cariveau DP. 2015. Abundance of common species, not species richness, drives delivery of a real-world ecosystem service. Ecology Letters 18:626-635
  170. Winfree R, Reilly JR, Bartomeus I, Cariveau DP, Williams NM. 2018. Species turnover promotes the importance of bee diversity for crop pollination at regional scales. Science 359:791-793
  171. Woodcock BA, Bullock JM, Shore RF, Heard MS, Pereira MG, Redhead J, Ridding L, Dean H, Sleep D, Henrys P+9 more. 2017. Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees. Science 356:1393-1395
  172. Everaars J, Settele J, Dormann CF. 2018. Fragmentation of nest and foraging habitat affects time budgets of solitary bees, their fitness and pollination services, depending on traits: results from an individual-based model. PLOS ONE 13:e0188269

Additional Metadata

Floral associations are based on Welsh, S. L., & Atwood, N. D. (2002). Flora of the bureau of land management Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument and Kane County, Utah. Provo: Brigham Young University, 166. When the Darwin core field Individualcount has a number greater than 1, this can represent a mating pair (male and female mounted on the same pin) or the use of a gel cap to house multiple specimens of the same sex on a single pin. Specimens with the ownerInstitutionCode "GSENM" have been deposited with the visitor center as a synoptic collection.

Maintenance Description Periodic update of morpho species to valid names. Morpho species identification is being served with in the field "identificationRemarks"
Alternative Identifiers 491177c8-d074-46c0-9da3-0e9d1794936f
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5867
https://ipt.gbif.us/resource?r=usda-gsenm-inventory