Saproxylic fungi of fine woody debris studied by metabarcoding-based MycoPins method in Oulanka, Finland, 2022-2023

データ レコード

この オカレンス（観察データと標本) リソース内のデータは、1 つまたは複数のデータ テーブルとして生物多様性データを共有するための標準化された形式であるダーウィン コア アーカイブ (DwC-A) として公開されています。 コア データ テーブルには、81,896 レコードが含まれています。

拡張データ テーブルは1 件存在しています。拡張レコードは、コアのレコードについての追加情報を提供するものです。 各拡張データ テーブル内のレコード数を以下に示します。

この IPT はデータをアーカイブし、データ リポジトリとして機能します。データとリソースのメタデータは、 ダウンロード セクションからダウンロードできます。 バージョン テーブルから公開可能な他のバージョンを閲覧でき、リソースに加えられた変更を知ることができます。

バージョン

次の表は、公にアクセス可能な公開バージョンのリソースのみ表示しています。

引用方法

研究者はこの研究内容を以下のように引用する必要があります。:

Shumskaya M, Lim J, Saarinen P K, Apgar S, Hoyte B, Nunez M, Gayathri M S, Vengine L, Salib C, Seidle M, Inoa A, Nguyen T, Twdroos J, Luna A, Herrera-Juarez J (2025). Saproxylic fungi of fine woody debris studied by metabarcoding-based MycoPins method in Oulanka, Finland, 2022-2023. Version 1.14. Kean University. Occurrence dataset. https://ipt.gbif.us/resource?r=mycopinsfinland23-24&v=1.14

権利

研究者は権利に関する下記ステートメントを尊重する必要があります。:

パブリッシャーとライセンス保持者権利者は Kean University。 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY 4.0) License.

GBIF登録

このリソースをはGBIF と登録されており GBIF UUID: 63283fef-d82f-40ba-9346-c4810e9690dcが割り当てられています。   GBIF-US によって承認されたデータ パブリッシャーとして GBIF に登録されているKean University が、このリソースをパブリッシュしました。

キーワード

dead wood; molecular ecology; metabarcoding; Samplingevent; Specimen

連絡先

地理的範囲

Oulanka Research Station https://eu-interact.org/field-sites/oulanka-research-station/ 25 km south of the Arctic Circle Sub-Arctic (Boreal zone) No permafrost

生物分類学的範囲

Saproxylic fungi from Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes were identified from DNA extracted from saw dust of wooden pins (pine, spruce, birch) using MycoPins method (Shumskaya, 2023).

時間的範囲

プロジェクトデータ

The MycoPins (previously: ezDowels) project aimed to develop a rapid affordable protocol to monitor early colonization events in communities of boreal wood-inhabiting (saproxylic) fungi. Building upon research experiences of applicants, earlier INTERACT data, and the latest metabarcoding methods, setting and testing of sampling techniques was performed, as well as sample processing, data processing and analysis of the development of early dead wood fungal communities. The fieldwork carried out at INTERACT sites was followed by the laboratory analysis at Kean university. The project aimed to add a new monitoring method for INTERACT portfolio, and pave a way for a broader scale Remote Access project, and establish a well-documented internationally standardized data publishing routine for research stations to increase visibility and current Virtual Access through global data discoverability portals.

プロジェクトに携わる要員:

収集方法

A sextet of sterilized wooden pins of three types of wood, each in a duplicate (softwood - pine and spruce, and hardwood - birch), were placed on the top soil along three different sampling sites: transect A - conifer forest with reindeer access, transect B - conifer forest without reindeer access, transect C - broadleaf forest with access to tourists. The pins were collected approximately every 2 weeks during summer and fall seasons between July 1, 2022 and October 6, 2023, with the exceptions for the time periods when the transects were not accessible (e.g. winter).

Method step description:

1. MycoPin placement Three 10 m wires (transects) were prepared with pin sets (MycoPins) attached to each one of them at every meter. Each MycoPin set consisted of 6 pins (a sextet): a pair of pine pins (softwood), a pair of birch pins (hardwood), and a pair of spruce pins (softwood). Each sextet was labeled with a sample number (six numbers and a letter: A and B for pine, C and D for birch, E and F for spruce). Each transect was attached to a tree and then placed on the top soil with the pin sets buried under the top leaf and soil matter. One transect was placed at three different sampling sites: (A) An area of a boreal forest unprotected from reindeers. (B) An area of a boreal forest located next to A, but protected from grazing by reindeers. (C) An area of a mixed broadleaf forest, accessed by random visitors.
2. Extraction and storage. One MycoPin sextet from each transect was located using the wire transect as a guide and collected every two weeks with exceptions for weather conditions. The collected sextets were dried in separate waxed paper bags for 2-3 hours at 45°C and stored dry at room temperature.
3. DNA isolation. The core of each pin from each sexted was drilled using a 2 mm fire-sterilized drill bit. The resultant sawdust was collected in a sterile centrifuge tube. The sawdust was then used to isolate genomic DNA using PowerSoil DNA Isolation kit from Qiagen (USA) according to the manufacturer instructions. Homogenization was performed using BeadBug homogenizers (BenchMark Scientific). DNA concentration was measured using NanoDrop (ThermoFisher). Genomic DNA was stored at −80°C.
4. PCR. Tagged primers for the ITS2 fungal region were used to perform PCR according to Clemmensen (2016). Forward and reverse primers were ITS7 andITS4, . Using this F/R primer sequence, a set of 40 tagged primer pairs was generated to individualize each PCR procedure. 10-nucleotide long unique tags were added to primers during oligonucleotide synthesis. Each DNA extracted from each MycoPin was subjected to PCR with a uniquely tagged primer pair. The amplification was verified via agarose gel electrophoresis. The amplified DNA was purified and stored at −20°C. E.Z.N.A® Cycle Pure Kit (Omega Bio-tek) was used for the amplicons purification. Positive control was used to verify the PCR and subsequent NGS in a form of mock fungal community made of 12 plasmids (Palmer, 2018), negative control (water) was used to exclude false-positive results. Tagging of PCR fragments allowed for mixing them into a single multiplex for a subsequent Next Generation Sequencing; the resultant sequence file can be sorted into clusters by tags, allowing to segregate individual amplicons.
5. Next-Generation Sequencing. The amplified tagged DNA samples were combined at equal amounts of 100 ng to create a multiplex for next-generation sequencing. The multiplex was sequenced using AmpliconEZ service at Genewiz (Azenta Life Sciences, New Jersey, USA).
6. Bioinformatics.

   Two paired FASTQ files for each multiplex were analyzed using SCATA (https://scata.mykopat.slu.se/), a bioinformatic tool designed for analyzing sequenced tagged amplicons. The FASTQ files were uploaded and verified as SCATA datasets. Low quality sequences were excluded, similar sequences were clustered, and abundance data for each cluster was calculated.

   The sequence quality was based on several criteria using SCATA default parameters, they include (1) a 90% primer match on tag identification, (2) a minimum sequence length of 200, (3) a minimum base quality of 10, and (4) a minimum mean base quality of 20. The FASTQ files were overlapped and merged. Kmer size for overlap search was set to 7. The minimum number of adjacent kmers to form high-scoring segment pairs during overlap search was set to 5. The minimum number of shared kmers to merge a read pair was set to 10.

   SCATA uses the USEARCH algorithm for clustering. Using the SCATA clustering criteria defaults, the clustering distance was set to 0.015, the minimum proportion of the longest sequence in a sequence pair to consider for clustering was set to 0.85, the penalty for mismatch was set to 1, and no penalty was set on an introduction of an open gap. However, a penalty of 1 is incurred for each succeeding gap. No weights were used for end gaps. Homopolymers longer than 3 before clustering were collapsed. No downsampling and no removal of low frequency genotypes were performed during clustering. Up to 3 representative sequences were reported for each cluster. Double clusters and clusters present in positive and negative controls were excluded.

   Each set of representative sequences is matched to a species found in the UNITE v. 9.0 (2023-07-18) fungi database. For each of the clusters without a match, a BLASTn search against the NCBI database was performed. The search result with the lowest e-value and the highest percent identity was considered the best match species for the cluster. The BLASTn match results with a score less than 200 were excluded. If there are multiple best matches, the first match in the best match list is selected.

   The abundance data (DNA sequence reads) of the same species were amalgamated.

   Each species identification was aligned with the taxonomy of GBIF Backbone using statistical software R and rgbif package v. 3.7.9. Non-fungal species were rejected. Fungal species not identified on the genus-level, at the minimum, were also discarded. Fungal traits were assigned according to FungalTraits database (from an Excel sheet, supplementary data of Põlme, 2020). Historical weather data for each transect were gathered from Weatherstack (www.weatherstack.com).

   Note:The abundance data is used as the Organism Quantity in the GBIF occurrence dataset with “DNA sequence reads” as the Organism Quantity Type. The value is used to pertain to the abundance of a species relative to other species present for a particular event (date-transect-substrate).

コレクションデータ

書誌情報の引用

1. Shumskaya M, Lorusso N, Patel U, Leigh M, Somervuo P, Schigel D (2023) MycoPins: a metabarcoding-based method to monitor fungal colonization of fine woody debris. Mycokeys: 77-95. 10.3897/mycokeys.96.101033
2. Clemmensen KE, Ihrmark K, Durling MB, Lindahl BD (2016) Sample Preparation for Fungal Community Analysis by High-Throughput Sequencing of Barcode Amplicons. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, NJ). Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 61-88. 10.1007/978-1-4939-3369-3_4
3. Palmer JM, Jusino MA, Banik MT, Lindner DL (2018) Non-biological synthetic spike-in controls and the AMPtk software pipeline improve mycobiome data. Peerj 6: e4925. 10.7717/peerj.4925
4. Abarenkov, K.; Zirk, A.; Piirmann, T.; Pöhönen, R.; Ivanov, F.; Nilsson, H.; Kõljalg, U.(2023): UNITE general FASTA release for Fungi 2. Version 18.07.2023. UNITE Community. 10.15156/BIO/2938068
5. Põlme, S., Abarenkov, K., Henrik Nilsson, R., Lindahl, B. D., Clemmensen, K. E., Kauserud, H., Nguyen, N., Kjøller, R., Bates, S. T., Baldrian, P., Frøslev, T. G., Adojaan, K., Vizzini, A., Suija, A., Pfister, D., Baral, H. O., Järv, H., Madrid, H., ... Pradeep, C. K. (2020). FungalTraits: a user-friendly traits database of fungi and fungus-like stramenopiles. Fungal Diversity, 105(1), 1-16. 10.1007/s13225-020-00466-2

追加のメタデータ